Category SEC
Appeal of Robert Allen Stanford – Sep. 10, 2014
Following part of the appeal of Stanford. STATEMENT OF ISSUES I. Whether the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had jurisdiction and regulatory authority over Stanford International Bank Limited (SIB), or its Certificates of Deposit (CDs). And whether, following the SEC’s civil action, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) criminal Indictment was defective. II. Whether the simultaneous […]
Apelacion de Robert Allen Stanford – Sep. 10, 2014
A continuación parte de la apelación de Stanford. DECLARACIÓN DE TEMAS I. si la Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) tenía jurisdicción y autoridad reguladora sobre Stanford International Bank Limited (SIB), o sus certificados de depósito (CD). Y si, después de la acción civil de la SEC, la acusación penal del Departamento de Justicia (DOJ) era […]
The “Conclusion”, “Requested Relief” and the “Restitution” (part of the appeal)
The appeal will be filed in a matter of just a few days. All of us involved in its development agree that all of the victims should see the “Conclusion”, “Requested Relief” and the “Restitution” part of the appeal before it’s printed and presented in court. CONCLUSION “When the law has exceeded its proper functions, […]
INITIAL REPLY BRIEF OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, APPELLANT
By Michael L. Post In its opening brief, the Securities and Exchange Commission established that the district court erred both in incorrectly applying a preponderance standard of proof in this preliminary, summary proceeding and in applying an unduly narrow construction of the statutory term “customer” to preclude the possibility of coverage under the Securities Investor […]
Recent Comments