To the Stanford International Bank depositors, and clients of the global Stanford Financial Group As this is the first statement from me since the February 17, 2009 destruction of the global Stanford companies, and my imprisonment for allegedly operating a fraud that has been referred to as a “Ponzi scheme”, I want to be direct, […]

A los depositantes de Stanford International Bank y clientes del global Stanford FinancialGroup Como éste es la primera declaración de mí parte desde la destrucción de 17 de febrero de 2009 de las empresas mundiales de Stanford, y mi encarcelación por presuntamente operar un fraude que se ha referido como un “esquema Ponzi”, quiero ser […]

I. si la Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) tenía jurisdicción y autoridad reguladora sobre Stanford International Bank Limited (SIB), o sus certificados de depósito (CD). Y si, después de la acción civil de la SEC, la acusación penal del Departamento de Justicia (DOJ) era defectuoso.   No creemos que el gobierno puso en evidencia o […]

Following part of the appeal of Stanford. STATEMENT OF ISSUES I. Whether the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had jurisdiction and regulatory authority over Stanford International Bank Limited (SIB), or its Certificates of Deposit (CDs). And whether, following the SEC’s civil action, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) criminal Indictment was defective. II. Whether the simultaneous […]

A continuación parte de la apelación de Stanford. DECLARACIÓN DE TEMAS I. si la Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) tenía jurisdicción y autoridad reguladora sobre Stanford International Bank Limited (SIB), o sus certificados de depósito (CD). Y si, después de la acción civil de la SEC, la acusación penal del Departamento de Justicia (DOJ) era […]

The appeal will be filed in a matter of just a few days. All of us involved in its development agree that all of the victims should see the “Conclusion”, “Requested Relief” and the “Restitution” part of the appeal before it’s printed and presented in court. CONCLUSION “When the law has exceeded its proper functions, […]

Motion to Vacate filed on 24 April 2014, based on: 1) SEC lack of jurisdictional or regulatory authority over SIB 2) Denial of Due Process, and improper venue for their complaint 3) Blatant violation of Stanford’s Fourth Amendment right to protection from illegal search and seizure 4) Fraud upon de Court in this matter Janvey […]